Integrating Environmental Review into the Temporary Group Housing Site Selection Process The purpose of this brochure is to introduce to Addressing The Need Temporary group housing sites are sometimes necessary when disaster events render homes uninhabitable for long periods, and when the preferred response of placing travel trailers or manufactured homes on the victim’s individual property is infeasible. Environmental review, in combination with other feasibility studies, permits FEMA to expeditiously select and build temporary group housing sites for disaster victims in physically and environmentally safe conditions, while complying with applicable federal laws. It is imperative to recognize that environmental considerations are in place not only to protect sensitive resources in the community, but also to ensure that the temporary residents are not placed in harms way (i.e., in floodplains or near hazardous materials.) Challenges Understanding the level of need. Because disaster victims often seek immediate shelter with friends or relatives instead of at emergency shelters, a preliminary count of displaced people can be deceptively low. Also, typical public communication channels may be disrupted or nonexistent during disaster recovery efforts, slowing or stopping the flow of valid information about temporary group housing opportunities Dealing with a lack of housing resources. For some communities, housing and rental shortages are a fact of life even during normal times. After a disaster, any vacancies come at a premium. A lack of rental resources during disaster recovery efforts may require the implementation of a Manufactured Housing Program, with temporary group housing sites selected to locate travel trailers or mobile homes. Seemingly Ideal sites may have hidden problems. Sites that appear suitable at first glance may prove problematic from a design, engineering, or environmental standpoint after an environmental review has been completed. For example, a seemingly ideal temporary group housing site may be located in the floodplain, contain wetlands, impact historic properties, or have hazardous materials contamination. Key Environmental Issues to Examine: · Floodplains and Wetlands · Hazardous Materials · Historic and Cultural Resources · Threatened and Endangered Species · Socioeconomic Issues and Environmental Justice · Air, Water, and Soil Resources · Noise and Visual Resources Considerations Identify multiple sites. This is a critical first step, because FEMA cannot afford the time delay if the primary site selected is determined not to be feasible for locating temporary housing. Evaluating multiple sites simultaneously provides timely options. Start early and inform others of environmental requirements. To reduce both perceived and real timing issues, it is important to integrate environmental review with other site feasibility evaluations early in the temporary group housing site selection process. Address expectations. The expectations of agencies and officials can be better addressed by providing all involved with a clear understanding of the purpose and need for environmental review, along with a plan that highlights implementation strategies and timelines. This approach should also identify roles and responsibilities, and ways regulatory and review agencies can assist with the efforts. Coordination is critical. There will be multiple federal, state, and local agencies and officials involved in the temporary group housing site selection process. As a rule, temporary housing initiatives are high stress situations. The potential sites must be identified, and the owners contacted to determine site availability and to obtain access to the site for evaluation. Each site must be proven to be technically and environmentally feasible, and available for development within a very short time frame. The public must receive notification of FEMA’s plans to develop a site, and have the opportunity to comment on the proposal. Additionally, no site development or construction can occur until the environmental review has been completed, and the process has determined that the implementation of temporary group housing would not result in any significant environmental impacts. Legal Requirements The environmental review is most typically evaluated through the NEPA documentation process known as an Environmental Assessment (EA). The EA examines the proposed action of placing temporary group housing at a given site, the natural resources present in the surrounding environment, and potential impacts that could result from the implementation of temporary group housing. There may be other levels of NEPA documentation and related studies based on the scope and location of the project, including Categorical Exclusion or an Environmental Impact Statement. Frequently Asked Questions In a truly critical situation, the lives and safety of people take precedent over environmental concerns, and environmental laws and regulations support this premise. When there is time, however, we are required to assess the situation and make informed decisions that address the immediate need and the long term health and needs of our environment and communities. Who coordinates this Environmental Review? The Environmental Officer, located in FEMA’s Disaster Field Office, coordinates the environmental review and should be consulted anytime a disaster results in displaced victims that will require travel trailers or manufactured homes, and any time a site is being considered for the placement of temporary group housing. The Environmental Officer will help provide input on scope, integration, and timing of the environmental review process. Why is coordination the key to a successful temporary housing program? Determining a site’s engineering and environmental feasibility depends on reviews, permits, and clearances from many federal, state, and local agencies. Close coordination of all parties involved in the review process is crucial for expediting the environmental review and development of a site. FEMA’s Environmental Officer facilitates the coordination for environmental review. By working together on site visits and data collection, problematic sites can be quickly identified and eliminated, and critical assessments can be made in real time for those sites that have greater promise. How long does a typical environmental review for temporary group housing take? If the site is eligible for a Categorical Exclusion, the review can usually be accomplished in a few days. A more detailed environmental review, such as an Environmental Assessment, typically takes 7-14 days. This time includes initial site selection, environmental field and research investigations, creating the environmental review documentation, and a public comment period. Why is public comment required and important? NEPA regulations were designed to make public participation part of the environmental review process. Once a draft NEPA document is published, the public is given an expedited period of 72 hours to provide comments on the document. Substantive comments received from the public must be addressed in a final NEPA document. What would happen if an environmental review were not conducted? Non-compliance with FEMA’s NEPA regulations can result in delay in delivering temporary group housing, the loss of funding for the temporary group housing efforts, unfavorable media coverage, or lawsuits. What issues will the environmental review focus on? The environmental review examines the existing conditions of the environment, and addresses potential environmental impacts of the placement of temporary group housing on that particular site and its environs. The review includes looking at impacts to:
What are the key steps in the environmental review process? One key step for conducting an environmental review involves obtaining legal rights of entry to the property in order to conduct a field assessment. Other key steps include reviewing the site from an engineering standpoint for soil or slope stability, infrastructure, accessibility, or past contamination. Observations and research findings are incorporated into the draft environmental review document. A public notice informs the community of the availability of the draft document for their review and comment. How is the environmental review process concluded? If through the NEPA review process it can be determined that no significant impacts would result from the implementation of temporary group housing at a given site, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is issued. However, if it were determined through the review process that there would be a significant impact to the environment from the proposed action that could not be mitigated, then an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be conducted. Due to the emergency nature of disaster recovery operations, lengthy EISs are not feasible, and another site should be selected as a replacement. Regional Environmental Officer Contacts The following is a list of the Regional Environmental Officers that should be notified concerning temporary housing site selection and the environmental review process. William KennedyFEMA Region I (ME, NH, VT, RI, CT, MA) Phone: 617-223-9528
Robert TranterFEMA Region II (NY, NJ, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands) Phone: 212-680-3628
Gene GruberFEMA Region III (DC, DE, MD, PA, VA, WV) Phone: 215-931-5610
William StrawFEMA Region IV (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN) Phone: 770-220-5432
Jeanne MillinFEMA Region V (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI) Phone: 312-408-5540 Kyle MillsFEMA Region VI (AK, LA, NM, OK, TX) Phone: 940-898-5134
Ken SessaFEMA Region VII (IA, KS, MO, NE) Phone: 816-283-7960
Bob CoxFEMA Region VIII (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY) Phone: 303-235-4714
Allessandro AmaglioFEMA Region IX (AZ, CA, HI, NV, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Palau) Phone: 415-923-7284
Mark EberleinFEMA Region X (AK, ID, OR, WA) Phone: 425-487-4735
Brent PaulFEMA Headquarters Phone: 202-646-3032
|